Aamir Khan Responds to ‘Love Jihad’ Allegations,
Bollywood star Aamir Khan has finally addressed allegations of promoting “Love Jihad” through his film PK
Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan took to Twitter on Monday morning to denounce the “Love Jihad” allegations tied to his 2014 film PK, as well as clarify his opinion on inter-religious marriages. Khan was adamantly opposed to the allegations and pointed to his family, saying that his daughters and sisters are married to Hindu men as proof that these marriages are simply marriages based on love without any consideration of religion.
“Love Jihad” describes a controversial and widely discredited conspiracy theory. Proponents claim that Muslim men deliberately target Hindu women to marry them and convert them to Islam.
This narrative has generated communal tensions in India since around 2009, and though there is little to no evidence of an organized conspiracy of this nature, and no investigation has demonstrated enough evidence of a claim to lead to a trial, there have been reports of conviction.
The emergence of PK, which chastised blind faith & the misuse of religion, has led some to accuse Khan and the film of advancing “Love Jihad”. They say that the depiction of interfaith romance is a manifestation of a conspiracy.
Aamir Khan stated:
“We are not against any religion. We respect all religions and all religious personalities.”
He stated that PK was meant to show how religion is sometimes used for money, not to ridicule any religion.
When asked about the “Love Jihad” accusations, he replied:
“Love jihad is not always when people from two religions, particularly Hindu and Muslim, fall in love and marry. This is humanity, which is above religion.”
To emphasize his stance, Khan brought up his own family’s stories: both of his sisters, Farhat Khan, married to Rajeev Dutta, and Nikhat Khan, married to Santosh Hegde, are in interfaith marriages. His daughter, Ira Khan, is also married to her Hindu partner, Nupur Shikhare.
He asked his critics, rhetorically: “Is this what you call love jihad?” The actor emphasized that, as far he is concerned, interfaith marriages in his own family have, at the bottom line, been made out of love and a natural human decision.
Aamir Khan’s explanation is personal:
Aamir Khan’s first wife was an Indian woman, Reena Dutta, a Hindu. His second wife, Kiran Rao, is also an Indian woman of Hindu background. He has named his children concerning cultural and national symbols, including a fairymaiden Indian goddess, Ira, and Azad, named after the Indian freedom fighter, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad.
This was Khan’s first specific, detailed public commentary since the longstanding allegations. Khan’s position supports PK’s objective to oppose mindless forms of religious expression, not to aim to intensify social divisions.
In India, there is a growing wave of Love Jihad’, with some states even proposing laws outlawing interfaith conversions via marriage. In this context, Khan’s very public clarification has social significance.
By referencing family, he sought to destigmatize interfaith marriages and promote love and freedom of association within whatever terms that feel appropriate.
Aamir Khan’s comments provide a voice of assurance: an interfaith marriage based on love does not fit the definition of illegality or fraud. It provides a voice to a higher principle, respect for religion as a choice in a multi-religious society.
In other words, Aamir Khan’s attempt to dispel communal misconceptions about marital unions between religions.
It represents a celebrity’s drama on display as the public connects to ACTUAL actions.
It exposes the tensions in India over issues of religious rights, conversions, and personal freedom.
As India prepares for the public debates around religious freedom and communal law, Aamir Kang’s statement could shape public discussion and perhaps ease fears around love against different religious identities.
Keep reading Celewood